Agency proved that some records are protected by the attorney-client privilege and attorney work-product doctrine. A portion of the Request was sufficiently specific under Section 703. Agency proved that certain records do not exist within the possession, custody or control of the agency. Request sought records related to an agency request for applications. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Pennsylvania Health and Wellness Pennsylvania Health and Wellness and Pennsyvania Health and Wellness v. Granted in part, denied in part and dismissed as moot in part.

The agency proved that certain records responsive to Item 7 of the Request reflect internal predecisionial deliberations. To the extent that the information responsive to Item 3 of the Request is not part of a performance review, the agency must provide that record to the Requester. Certain portions of the appeal were withdrawn. The redacted records provided to the Requester during the appeal in response to Item 7 of the Request contained exempt personal identification information. During the appeal, the agency provided records responsive to Items 8, 13, and part of Item 7. The agency proved that records responsive to Items 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 19, and part of Item 3, do not exist within the agency's possession custody or control. Request sought information pertaining to certain employees, as well as information related to the hiring process for an agency job position.

Cheltenham township police activity